🔗 Share this article

The ninth circuit court has upheld a prohibition on deploying state troops in Portland, Oregon, after a recent legal decision.

Judicial Panel Concurs to Rehear Case

The ninth circuit court of appeals decided on Tuesday that it would reexamine the case concerning the executive power with an expanded group of eleven justices. The judicial body also overturned a earlier decision from a smaller judicial group that had supported the administration.

Legal Saga Over Troop Deployment

This order represents the latest turn in a long-running court case over whether the former president has the legal right and valid reason to deploy state military units in Portland. Approximately two hundred troops have been in limbo since late September when the mobilization attempt was started in response to months of protests.

Conflicting Arguments

The federal government has argued that federal officials at the ICE facility in south Portland were facing threats, while local authorities assert that local officers have command of the circumstances.

In defiance of descriptions of Portland as a conflict zone, residents have been sharing footage of scenic paths and a vibrant culinary culture, and organizing activities such as an Emergency Naked Bike Ride against the “militarization of our city”.

Recent Legal Actions

The appeals court decision came after a US district judge in the city issued two temporary restraining orders this month – one blocking the federalization of the Oregon national guard, and another prohibiting the deployment of any military personnel in Oregon, after attempts to evade the first order by calling up troops from California.

On Monday, the appeals court had put the first ruling on hold – permitting command of 200 Oregon national guard – but the subsequent injunction stayed effective, blocking the physical sending of the troops.

En Banc Review

The Tuesday decision means the issue will be heard “en banc” – with both rulings under review together – by a panel of 11 judges.

“This decision demonstrates that facts are important and that the courts are working to ensure government responsibility. The constitution limits the executive authority, and Oregon’s communities cannot be treated as a training ground for unchecked federal authority,” said the state attorney general in a statement.

“The judicial body is sending a clear message: the president cannot send the military into American urban areas unnecessarily. We will continue protecting state legislation, values, and autonomy as this case moves forward and our legal battle continues in the courts.”